|
Polls
Oct 26, 2015 15:28:01 GMT
Post by Oregon Three Lions of Madison on Oct 26, 2015 15:28:01 GMT
If I have missed any of the concerns you've sent to me or if you have thought of anything else you would like brought up for discussion/voting let me know. At the moment we have gone through every issue that was sent to me.
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 26, 2015 17:03:25 GMT
Post by Ft. Myers Conquistadors on Oct 26, 2015 17:03:25 GMT
New Payout Structure - maybe have a discussion before a vote
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 26, 2015 17:36:39 GMT
Post by Oregon Three Lions of Madison on Oct 26, 2015 17:36:39 GMT
We have done away with the Cat(Wins) payouts. Is there more that you guys would like to get rid of? As of now we are paying out Division winners and playoff finishes 1-7. If we do cut payouts for consolation finishers(3-7) we will also have to get rid of the draft pick element as well. If you don't have the money element it would benefit you to lose your consolation matchup for the better draft pick which would be craziness. Ryan, how much are we adding to the overall pool with the elimination of cat payouts?
Any other thoughts or ideas you have let us know. Ryan will draw up a payout structure based off of this thread for us to put to a vote. It would be great if the conversation about this topic could be done here and now, so the poll would be more of a formality.
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 26, 2015 19:25:54 GMT
Post by Ft. Myers Conquistadors on Oct 26, 2015 19:25:54 GMT
Off the top of my head I think this would make sense:
20 x $120 = $2400 total pot $80 Fantrax fee = $2,320 payout pot 4 division winners @ $60 each = $240 1st - $1,080 2nd - $650 3rd - $350
This would make the playoffs REAL competitive!
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 27, 2015 1:06:37 GMT
Post by Oakland Oaks on Oct 27, 2015 1:06:37 GMT
That looks pretty good but I still think 1st should get more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Polls
Oct 28, 2015 14:30:52 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2015 14:30:52 GMT
I still like the idea of division winners getting back the entry fee, lets make that $100 each and knock $160 off top 3.
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 28, 2015 15:34:39 GMT
Post by Oregon Three Lions of Madison on Oct 28, 2015 15:34:39 GMT
I agree with Ted. I would like to see division winners get more cash.
With regards to the winner getting more...The payouts are already decent at the top for me. I really don't want to see this get massively top heavy. I love winning cash as much as the next guy, but in my opinion making things too top heavy could create a couple big problems. It could create an ultra competitive environment that makes trying to find loopholes a regular occurrence. This could also diminish the relationships within the group because every issue that is brought up gets magnified and opinions get intensified because the prize is so big. You could also see more drastic pushes through trades to win a championship. You all know I like trading, but I don't want to see squads massively killing their rosters for the future in order to win a championship. To me that creates an environment that could ultimately see teams bolt with some cash while leaving a roster that is so jacked up that it will be hard to find a person that is willing to take it over. The entry fee is worth the fun to me, but can't say that is the same for everyone.
Basically, my feelings are that this being a dynasty league makes it unique. The long term health should be goal number one, and making this league too top heavy in terms of payouts, I feel, is not good or this league.
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 29, 2015 5:05:23 GMT
Post by Oakland Oaks on Oct 29, 2015 5:05:23 GMT
Great points Andy.
|
|
|
Polls
Oct 29, 2015 22:02:44 GMT
Post by Manalapan Devil Dogs on Oct 29, 2015 22:02:44 GMT
I also think division winners should break even, also believe 1st should get at least double what 2nd gets
|
|